Readwise vs Feedly vs Inoreader Pricing 2026

If you searched Readwise vs Feedly vs Inoreader pricing in 2026, here is the short answer first: Readwise currently lists $9.99/month billed annually or $12.99 billed monthly with a 30-day trial (Readwise pricing), while Inoreader lists $7.50/month billed annually or $9.99 billed monthly and a permanent free tier with explicit limits (Inoreader pricing). Feedly confirms Free/Pro/Pro+/Enterprise tiers but pushes pricing details to its plan page (Feedly docs). This comparison matters because Readless is already getting impressions for these terms with almost no clicks.

SERP intent answer block: People searching pricing terms usually want four things fast: monthly cost, annual cost, free-plan constraints, and who each tool is best for. The dominant SERP pattern is straightforward pricing breakdowns plus comparison modifiers like "vs", "free plan limits", and "is it worth it". This page follows that exact intent format before going deeper into workflow fit.

Related video from YouTube

Search Console opportunity snapshot

Title variants drafted for this page were: Control: "Newsletter Reader Pricing 2026"; Challenger A: "Readwise vs Feedly vs Inoreader Pricing 2026"; Challenger B: "Reader App Pricing 2026: Which Plan Is Worth It?" We selected Challenger A because it front-loads the highest-impression entity in this cluster (Readwise), includes direct comparison intent, and mirrors top SERP language around explicit tool-vs-tool pricing.

1. Readwise vs Feedly vs Inoreader pricing in 2026 (direct answer)

Readwise currently publishes $9.99/month billed annually or $12.99 billed monthly, and states a 30-day free trial (official page). Inoreader publishes $7.50/month billed annually or $9.99 billed monthly and makes free-tier limits visible on the same pricing table (official page). Feedly documents plan tiers and points users to its pricing page for plan details (official docs).

"

"Readwise is free for first 30 days. After the free trial, Readwise costs a small monthly fee." - Readwise pricing FAQ

If your main KPI is time saved per week rather than maximum features, do not compare sticker prices alone. Compare total attention cost: setup time, daily triage time, and how often the tool reduces decision fatigue.

2. Free-plan limits that actually trigger upgrades

Inoreader is unusually explicit about free limits, which makes budget decisions easier. At the time of writing, the public page lists 150 RSS subscriptions and 20 newsletter feeds on Free. Once users exceed those, upgrades become much more predictable. Feedly's free-vs-paid structure is clear in docs, but exact limit interpretation usually requires checking the live plan UI. That difference in transparency alone influences migration decisions.

"

"In an information-rich world, the wealth of information means a dearth of something else... What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients." - Herbert A. Simon

This is exactly why reader app comparison pages outperform generic listicles for pricing intent: users are optimizing attention allocation, not collecting feature checklists.

3. Which tool is best for each workflow

1. Readwise first: best when highlights, spaced review, and note export are central to your workflow.
2. Inoreader first: best when you need strong feed controls, filtering rules, and explicit limits at lower entry cost.
3. Feedly first: best when you prioritize UI simplicity and moderate feed volume.
4. Digest-first alternative: best when your pain is inbox triage time, not feed discovery.

"

"It's not information overload. It's filter failure." - Clay Shirky

If that quote describes your week, use pricing to choose a filtering model, not just a product logo. Start with Feedly alternatives and Inoreader alternatives, then map costs to your true volume.

4. Pros and cons by pricing model

There is no universal winner. The cheapest plan can become the most expensive if it causes daily context switching. Conversely, paying more can be rational when it removes enough friction to reclaim focused time.

5. 15-minute pricing audit checklist

1. Minute 1-3: Count your active sources and newsletters from the past 14 days.
2. Minute 4-6: Mark which items you actually finished reading, not just opened.
3. Minute 7-9: Estimate weekly triage time in minutes for your current setup.
4. Minute 10-12: Compare annual spend and free-tier limits across 2-3 tools.
5. Minute 13-15: Pick one trial path and define one KPI: hours saved or decisions reduced.

"

"Clarity about what matters provides clarity about what does not." - Cal Newport

6. Hidden costs most pricing pages do not show

Monthly subscription price is only one part of total cost. The larger cost is often attention drag. McKinsey's long-cited collaboration research estimates that the average interaction worker spends around 28% of the workweek managing email. Separately, Radicati projects total global email traffic above 424 billion messages per day by 2028. In other words, message volume keeps rising, so workflows that reduce triage time generally compound value faster than small subscription price differences.

This is why many users end up with a hybrid stack: one tool for discovery and one for synthesis. If discovery quality is already good but reading time remains high, optimize for synthesis first. If synthesis is fine but source quality is weak, optimize discovery first.

7. A 30-day migration test you can run this week

Instead of switching everything on day one, run a controlled 30-day test. Keep your current setup, introduce one comparison tool, and track outcomes weekly. This prevents overreaction to first-week friction and gives you evidence for the final decision.

1. Week 1: Baseline your current process (daily reading minutes, unread count, and duplicate-story frequency).
2. Week 2: Route only your top 10-15 high-value sources through the new workflow.
3. Week 3: Expand to all recurring sources and compare consistency across weekdays.
4. Week 4: Decide keep/upgrade/switch using measured outcomes, not feature impressions.

If your outcome is still noisy after 30 days, the issue is usually not the app brand. It is scope. Most teams follow too many low-yield sources. Trim the source list first, then compare tools again.

Conclusion

For 2026 pricing intent, the practical ranking order is simple: compare annual and monthly totals, validate free-tier constraints, and choose the workflow that minimizes attention cost. Readwise usually wins for retention workflows, Inoreader often wins on transparent value, and Feedly remains a strong simple-reader option. If your bottleneck is newsletter overload, a summarization layer can outperform all three on time-to-insight.

• Readwise: strongest for highlight-heavy reading systems.
• Inoreader: strongest for power users with explicit limit and pricing visibility.
• Feedly: strongest for simpler daily feed reading.
• Readless path: strongest when your KPI is reducing reading time, not opening more tabs.

If you want a direct next step, compare reader workflows at newsletter reader apps, then validate fit on pricing and how it works.

FAQs

How much is Readwise Reader in 2026?

On the official Readwise pricing page, the published pricing is $9.99/month billed annually or $12.99 billed monthly, with a 30-day free trial.

Is Inoreader cheaper than Readwise?

Based on current published pricing, Inoreader Pro has a lower annual entry point than Readwise. Inoreader also publishes free-plan limits directly, which can simplify decision-making for budget-sensitive users.

When should I use an AI digest instead of a reader app?

Use a digest-first workflow when your main problem is triage time and context switching. If your goal is to reduce reading time while staying informed, start with AI newsletter summarization.

Related Reads

• Newsletter Reader Apps Comparison
• Readless vs Feedly
• Feedly Alternative
• Inoreader Alternative